手机体育投注平台

Advertisement

Fidget Spinners May Decrease Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Cognitively Challenging Fine Motor Tasks

  • Reza KoilerEmail author
  • Elham Bakhshipour
  • Austin Schimmel
  • Andrez Jones
  • Kimberlly Milla
  • Patricia A. Shewokis
  • Nancy Getchell
Conference paper
  • 328 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1201)

Abstract

Despite increasing popularity, media attention, and commercial success of fidget spinners, scientific evidence on their effectiveness is scarce. The purpose of this study was to explore how fidget spinners affect fine motor performance and its neural correlates in the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC). Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to examine the PFC activity while a group of healthy adult participants completed five different sub-tasks of the Purdue Pegboard Task (PPT). In this study, fidget spinners resulted in a significant decrease in ΔHbO compared to the controls during performance of the more cognitively demanding assembly subtask despite no differences in behavioral output. No other main effects for group existed in the other sub-tasks, although significant group by block interactions occurred in all four brain regions. This finding suggests that fidget spinners may reduce the cognitive load on LDLPFC during a cognitively challenging fine motor task.

Keywords

Fidget spinner fNIRS ADHD Fine motor 

References

  1. 1.
    Mehrabian, A., Friedman, S.L.: An analysis of fidgeting and associated individual differences. J. Pers. 54(2), 406–429 (1986)
  2. 2.
    F. G.: The measure of fidget. Nature 32(817), 174–175 (1885)
  3. 3.
    Gawrilow, C., Kühnhausen, J., Schmid, J., Stadler, G.: Hyperactivity and motoric activity in ADHD: Characterization, assessment, and intervention. Front. Psychiatry, 5, 171 (2014). Frontiers Research Foundation
  4. 4.
    Seli, P., Carriere, J.S.A., Thomson, D.R., Cheyne, J.A., Martens, K.A.E., Smilek, D.: Restless mind, restless body. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 40(3), 660–668 (2014)
  5. 5.
    Carriere, J.S.A., Seli, P., Smilek, D.: Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 67(1), 19–31 (2013)
  6. 6.
    Farley, J., Risko, E.F., Kingstone, A.: Everyday attention and lecture retention: the effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Front. Psychol. 4, 619 (2013)
  7. 7.
    Gligorić, N., Uzelac, A., Krco, S.: Smart classroom: real-time feedback on lecture quality. In: 2012 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, PERCOM Workshops 2012, pp. 391–394 (2012)
  8. 8.
    Pine, K.J., Bird, H., Kirk, E.: The effects of prohibiting gestures on children’s lexical retrieval ability. Dev. Sci. 10(6), 747–754 (2007)
  9. 9.
    Sarver, D.E., Rapport, M.D., Kofler, M.J., Raiker, J.S., Friedman, L.M.: Hyperactivity in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): impairing deficit or compensatory behavior? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 43(7), 1219–1232 (2015)
  10. 10.
    Hartanto, T.A., Krafft, C.E., Iosif, A.M., Schweitzer, J.B.: A trial-by-trial analysis reveals more intense physical activity is associated with better cognitive control performance in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Child Neuropsychol. 22(5), 618–626 (2016)
  11. 11.
    Rapport, M.D., Bolden, J., Kofler, M.J., Sarver, D.E., Raiker, J.S., Alderson, R.M.: Hyperactivity in boys with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a ubiquitous core symptom or manifestation of working memory deficits? J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 37(4), 521–534 (2009)
  12. 12.
    Musall, S., Kaufman, M.T., Juavinett, A.L., Gluf, S., Churchland, A.K.: Single-trial neural dynamics are dominated by richly varied movements. Nat. Neurosci. 22(10), 1677–1686 (2019)
  13. 13.
    Daily chart - The fidget-spinner boom | Graphic detail | The Economist. . Accessed 13 Feb 2020
  14. 14.
    Impeachment trial: Senators use fidget spinners and stress balls to relieve boredom during Trump impeachment proceedings - CBS News. . Accessed 12 Feb 2020
  15. 15.
    Schecter, R.A., Shah, J., Fruitman, K., Milanaik, R.L.: Fidget spinners: purported benefits, adverse effects and accepted alternatives. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 29(5), 616–618 (2017)
  16. 16.
    Graziano, P.A., Garcia, A.M., Landis, T.D.: To fidget or not to fidget, that is the question: a systematic classroom evaluation of fidget spinners among young children with ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 24(1), 163–171 (2020)
  17. 17.
    Amico, G., Schaefer, S.: No evidence for performance improvements in episodic memory due to fidgeting, doodling or a ‘neuro-enhancing’ drink. J. Cogn. Enhanc. 4(1), 2–11 (2019)
  18. 18.
    Soares, J.S., Storm, B.C.: Putting a negative spin on it: Using a fidget spinner can impair memory for a video lecture. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 34(1), 277–284 (2020)
  19. 19.
    Cohen, E.J., Bravi, R., Minciacchi, D.: The effect of fidget spinners on fine motor control. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2–11 (2018)
  20. 20.
    Mahbub, M., et al.: A systematic review of diagnostic performance of quantitative tests to assess musculoskeletal disorders in hand-arm vibration syndrome. Ind. Health 53(5), 391–397 (2015)
  21. 21.
    Lloyd-Fox, S., Blasi, A., Elwell, C.E.: Illuminating the developing brain: the past, present and future of functional near infrared spectroscopy. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34(3), 269–284 (2010)
  22. 22.
    Bakhshipour, E., Koiler, R., Milla, K., Getchell, N.: Understanding the Underlying Mechanisms of a Manual Dexterity Assessment using Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S26 (2019)
  23. 23.
    Milla, K., Bakhshipour, E., Bodt, B., Getchell, N.: Does movement matter? Prefrontal cortex activity during 2D vs. 3D performance of the tower of Hanoi puzzle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 156 (2019)
  24. 24.
    Ceja, K., Bakhshipour, E., Khoeilar, R., Getchell, N.: Does oxygenation of prefrontal cortex change in a two versus three-dimensional Tower of Hanoi task? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12 (2018)
  25. 25.
    Koiler, R., Bakhshipour, E., Milla, K., Plumb, M., Getchell, N.: Understanding handwriting pauses in the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting test using fNIRs. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 41, S38 (2019)
  26. 26.
    Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P.A., Curtin, A., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., Onaral, B.: Using MazeSuite and functional near infrared spectroscopy to study learning in spatial navigation. J. Vis. Exp. 56, 3443 (2011)
  27. 27.
    Shewokis, P.A., Shariff, F.U., Liu, Y., Ayaz, H., Castellanos, A., Lind, D.S.: Acquisition, retention and transfer of simulated laparoscopic tasks using fNIR and a contextual interference paradigm. Am. J. Surg. 213(2), 336–345 (2017)
  28. 28.
    NCSS 2019 Statistical Software. NCSS, LLC. Kaysville, Utah, USA (2019)
  29. 29.
    Kaller, C.P., Rahm, B., Spreer, J., Weiller, C., Unterrainer, J.M.: Dissociable contributions of left and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in planning. Cereb. Cortex 21(2), 307–317 (2011)

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Koiler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elham Bakhshipour
    • 1
  • Austin Schimmel
    • 1
  • Andrez Jones
    • 1
  • Kimberlly Milla
    • 2
  • Patricia A. Shewokis
    • 3
  • Nancy Getchell
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomechanics and Movement ScienceUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuropsychologyKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA
  3. 3.Nutrition Sciences Department, College of Nursing and Health Professions, School of Biomedical Engineering, Science and Health Systems, School of EducationDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations