手机体育投注平台

手机体育投注平台Advertisement

Assessment of Human-Likeness and Anthropomorphism of Robots: A Literature Review

  • Nina RothsteinEmail author
  • John Kounios
  • Hasan Ayaz
  • Ewart J. de Visser
Conference paper
  • 343 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1201)

Abstract

Robots are a human-like product. To address the challenge of measuring responses to an object perceived as part product – part entity, researchers have evaluated robot appearance based on human-likeness. This review presents research that views human-likeness through the lens of the psychological construct of anthropomorphism. This review also briefly considers contributions of two related psychological construct of human-likeness: media equation and uncanny valley.

Keywords

Human robot interaction Human-likeness Anthropomorphizing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

手机体育投注平台Authors would like to acknowledge Jan Watson, Marlon Gieser, and Levi Lightcap, for their thoughtful edits on this paper. And, authors would like to thank Molly Martini, Mikey Siegel, and Gabriele Trovato for allowing the use their images.

References

  1. 1.
    Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., Overbeeke, K.: Tangible products: redressing the balance between appearance and action. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 8, 294–309 (2004)
  2. 2.
    Kanwisher, N.: Domain specificity in face perception. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 759 (2000)
  3. 3.
    Burleigh, T.J., Schoenherr, J.R.: A reappraisal of the uncanny valley: categorical perception or frequency-based sensitization? Front. Psychol. 5, 1488 (2015)
  4. 4.
    Prakash, A., Rogers, W.A.: Why some humanoid faces are perceived more positively than others: effects of human-likeness and task. Int. J. Soc. Rob. 7, 309–331 (2015)
  5. 5.
    Green, R.D., MacDorman, K.F., Ho, C.-C., Vasudevan, S.: Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness. Comput. Hum. Behav. 24, 2456–2474 (2008)
  6. 6.
    Phillips, E., Ullman, D., de Graaf, M.M., Malle, B.F.: What does a robot look like?: a multi-site examination of user expectations about robot appearance. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting, pp. 1215–1219. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles, CA (2017)
  7. 7.
    Butler, R.: Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest, and performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 79, 474 (1987)
  8. 8.
    Galilei, G.: The Essential Galileo. Hackett Publishing, Indianapolis (2008)
  9. 9.
    Vogeley, K., Bussfeld, P., Newen, A., Herrmann, S., Happé, F., Falkai, P., Maier, W., Shah, N.J., Fink, G.R., Zilles, K.: Mind reading: neural mechanisms of theory of mind and self-perspective. Neuroimage 14, 170–181 (2001)
  10. 10.
    Wellman, H.M.: The Child’s Theory of Mind. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
  11. 11.
    Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114, 864 (2007)
  12. 12.
    Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Rob. Auton. Syst. 42, 177–190 (2003)
  13. 13.
    Burgess, A.M., Graves, L.M., Frost, R.O.: My possessions need me: anthropomorphism and hoarding. Scand. J. Psychol. 59, 340–348 (2018)
  14. 14.
    Brown, C.M., McLean, J.L.: Anthropomorphizing dogs: projecting one’s own personality and consequences for supporting animal rights. Anthrozoös 28, 73–86 (2015)
  15. 15.
    Phillips, E., Zhao, X., Ullman, D., Malle, B.F.: What is human-like?: decomposing robots’ human-like appearance using the anthropomorphic robot (abot) database. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 105–113. ACM (2018)
  16. 16.
    Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R.: Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 72–78 (1994)
  17. 17.
    de Visser, E.J., Monfort, S.S., McKendrick, R., Smith, M.A., McKnight, P.E., Krueger, F., Parasuraman, R.: Almost human: anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22, 331 (2016)
  18. 18.
    de Visser, E.J., Monfort, S.S., Goodyear, K., Lu, L., O’Hara, M., Lee, M.R., Parasuraman, R., Krueger, F.: A little anthropomorphism goes a long way: Effects of oxytocin on trust, compliance, and team performance with automated agents. Hum. Factors 59, 116–133 (2017)
  19. 19.
    Mori, M.: The uncanny valley. Energy 7, 33–35 (1970)
  20. 20.
    Martini, M.C., Gonzalez, C.A., Wiese, E.: Seeing minds in others–Can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS ONE 11, e0149766 (2016)
  21. 21.
    Naumann, L.P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P.J., Gosling, S.D.: Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 35, 1661–1671 (2009)
  22. 22.
    Wang, S.S., Brownell, K.D., Wadden, T.A.: The influence of the stigma of obesity on overweight individuals. Int. J. Obes. 28, 1333–1337 (2004)
  23. 23.
    Trovato, G., Lucho, C., Paredes, R.: She’s electric—the influence of body proportions on perceived gender of robots across cultures. Robotics 7, 50 (2018)
  24. 24.
    Bernotat, J., Eyssel, F., Sachse, J.: Shape it–the influence of robot body shape on gender perception in robots. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 75–84. Springer (2017)
  25. 25.
    Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I.: Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 2563–2568. IEEE (2009)
  26. 26.
    Martini, M.C., Gonzalez, C.A., Wiese, E.: Seeing minds in others–can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS ONE 11, e0146310 (2016)
  27. 27.
    Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., Takala, T.: A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Fron. Psychol. 6, 390 (2015)
  28. 28.
    Broadbent, E.: Interactions with robots: the truths we reveal about ourselves. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 68, 627–652 (2017)

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Rothstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • John Kounios
    • 1
  • Hasan Ayaz
    • 1
  • Ewart J. de Visser
    • 1
  1. 1.Drexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations