手机体育投注平台

Advertisement

Comparing Effect of Active vs. Passive Robotic Interaction on Joint Attention of Children with ASD

  • Faisal Mehmood
  • Sara AliEmail author
  • Yasar Ayaz
  • Muhammad Jawad Khan
  • Umer Asgher
Conference paper
  • 330 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1201)

Abstract

手机体育投注平台 Recent research shows that robotic therapies are effective for improving core autism impairments. This paper focuses on analyzing the effect of active versus passive robotic interaction on joint attention of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). In both types of interaction, robot records data related to joint attention (JA) of children, however, the action taken is different for both the interactions. In active interaction, robot’s interaction is coupled with JA whereas in passive interaction there is no coupling of JA. The experiment was conducted on 12 ASD children including 10 males and 2 females. Each child was introduced to 16 interactions per trial. Each trial comprised of 8 pairs of active and passive interactions each. The frequency of trials was once per week. Results show that children focus more in active robotic interactions with an average accuracy of 68% whereas for the passive interactions the average accuracy is 61%. The results show the significance of active interaction in robotic interventions for ASD children.

Keywords

Human-robot interaction Active interaction Passive interaction Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Joint attention 

Notes

Acknowledgement

手机体育投注平台We would like to acknowledgement the RISE lab of SMME-NUST and Autism Resource Center (ARC) for their support and resources during the research.

References

  1. 1.
    Bölte, S., Bartl-Pokorny, K.D., Jonsson, U., Berggren, S., Zhang, D., Kostrzewa, E., Falck-Ytter, T., Einspieler, C., Pokorny, F.B., Jones, E.J.H., et al.: How can clinicians detect and treat autism early? methodological trends of technology use in research. Acta Paediatr. 105, 137–144 (2016)
  2. 2.
    Dickstein-Fischer, L.A., Crone-Todd, D.E., Chapman, I.M., Fathima, A.T., Fischer, G.S.: Socially assistive robots: current status and future prospects for autism interventions. Innov. Entrep. Heal. 5, 15 (2018)
  3. 3.
    Cabibihan, J.-J., Javed, H., Aldosari, M., Frazier, T., Elbashir, H.: Sensing technologies for autism spectrum disorder screening and intervention. Sensors 17, 46 (2017)
  4. 4.
    Scassellati, B., Admoni, H., Mataric, M.J.: Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 14, 275–294 (2012)
  5. 5.
    Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K., Dubowski, J.: Does appearance matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot? Interact. Stud. 7, 479–512 (2006).  
  6. 6.
    Gernsbacher, M.A., Stevenson, J.L., Khandakar, S., Goldsmith, H.H.: Why does joint attention look atypical in autism? Child. Dev. Perspect. 2, 38–45 (2008)
  7. 7.
    Murza, K.A., Schwartz, J.B., Hahs-Vaughn, D.L., Nye, C.: Joint attention interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord. 51, 236–251 (2016)
  8. 8.
    Ali, S., Mehmood, F., Dancey, D., Ayaz, Y., Khan, M.J., Naseer, N., Amadeu, R.D.C., Sadia, H., Nawaz, R.: An adaptive multi-robot therapy for improving joint attention and imitation of ASD children. IEEE Access. 7, 81808–81825 (2019)
  9. 9.
    Ali, S., Mehmood, F., Ayaz, Y., Asgher, U., Khan, M.J.: Effect of different visual stimuli on joint attention of ASD children using NAO robot. In: International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 490–499 (2019)
  10. 10.
    Mehmood, F., Ayaz, Y., Ali, S., de Cassia Amadeu, R., Sadia, H.: Dominance in visual space of ASD children using multi-robot joint attention integrated distributed imitation system. IEEE Access (2019)
  11. 11.
    Gangi, D.N., Ibañez, L.V., Messinger, D.S.: Joint attention initiation with and without positive affect: Risk group differences and associations with ASD symptoms. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 1414–1424 (2014)
  12. 12.
    Swanson, M.R., Siller, M.: Patterns of gaze behavior during an eye-tracking measure of joint attention in typically developing children and children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 7, 1087–1096 (2013)
  13. 13.
    Dawson, G., Adams, A.: Imitation and social responsiveness in autistic children. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 12, 209–226 (1984)
  14. 14.
    Loveland, K.A., Landry, S.H.: Joint attention and language in autism and developmental language delay. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 16, 335–349 (1986)
  15. 15.
    Rocha, M.L., Schreibman, L., Stahmer, A.C.: Effectiveness of training parents to teach joint attention in children with autism. J. Early Interv. 29, 154–172 (2007)
  16. 16.
    Whalen, C., Schreibman, L.: Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 44, 456–468 (2003)

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faisal Mehmood
    • 1
  • Sara Ali
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yasar Ayaz
    • 1
  • Muhammad Jawad Khan
    • 1
  • Umer Asgher
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering (SMME)National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST)IslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations