Understanding the Cognitive Demands of the Purdue Pegboard Test: An fNIRs Study

  • Elham BakhshipourEmail author
  • Reza Koiler
  • Kimberly Milla
  • Nancy Getchell
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1201)


手机体育投注平台To evaluate manual dexterity in clinical settings Purdue Pegboard test (PPT) is widely used and consists of four uni- and bi-manual sub-tests. The objective of this study is to deep dive into PPT and parse out the cognitive component of the subtests using functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS). The prefrontal cortex (PFC) of 16 participants was assessed using fNIRS technique while performing PPT. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA was performed on average ∆HbR and ∆HbO in PFC regions (left DLPFC, left vmPFC, right vmPFC, right DLPFC). A Bonferroni correction was used to account for multiple comparisons. Results from both outcome measures taken together showed that assembly sub-task uses significantly higher resources in the left PFC. The findings can be summarized as follows: PPT measures more than manual dexterity. Subtask complexity affects the cognitive demands in the PFC. The Assembly may be the most sensitive subtest to the changes in PFC activity.


fNIRS Purdue Pegboard Fine motor Cognitive 



We sincerely thank Hosein Bakhshipour for all his support and encouragement.


  1. 1.
    Desrosiers, J., Hébert, R., Bravo, G., Dutil, E.: The Purdue Pegboard Test: normative data for people aged 60 and over. Disabil. Rehabil. 17(5), 217–224 (1995)
  2. 2.
    Tiffin, J., Asher, E.J.: The Purdue Pegboard: norms and studies of reliability and validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 32(3), 234–247 (1948)
  3. 3.
    Lavasani, N.M., Stagnitti, K.: A study on fine motor skills of Iranian children with attention deficit/hyper activity disorder aged from 6 to 11 years. Occup. Ther. Int. 18(2), 106–114 (2011)
  4. 4.
    Motlagh, M.G., et al.: Adverse effects of heavy prenatal maternal smoking on attentional control in children with ADHD. J. Atten. Disord. 15(7), 593–603 (2011)
  5. 5.
    Pitcher, T.M., Piek, J.P., Hay, D.A.: Fine and gross motor ability in males with ADHD. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 45(8), 525–535 (2003)
  6. 6.
    Ortiz-Rubio, A., Cabrera-Martos, I., Rodríguez-Torres, J., Fajardo-Contreras, W., Díaz-Pelegrina, A., Valenza, M.C.: Effects of a home-based upper limb training program in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 97(12), 2027–2033 (2016)
  7. 7.
    Akoudad, S., et al.: Association of cerebral microbleeds with cognitive decline and dementia. JAMA Neurol. 73(8), 934–943 (2016)
  8. 8.
    Hidese, S., et al.: Manual dexterity and brain structure in patients with schizophrenia: a whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Res. - Neuroimaging 276, 9–14 (2018)
  9. 9.
    Devrimsel, G., Turkyilmaz, A.K., Beyazal, M.S., Karkucak, M.: Assessment of hand function and disability in fibromyalgia Beurteilung der Handfunktion und Funktionsstörungen bei Fibromyalgie. Z. Rheumatol. 78, 889–893 (2018)
  10. 10.
    Shin, J.H., et al.: Effects of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on distal upper extremity function and health-related quality of life: a single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 13(1), 17 (2016)
  11. 11.
    Arnould, C., Bleyenheuft, Y., Thonnard, J.L.: Hand functioning in children with cerebral palsy. Front. Neurol. 5, 48 (2014)
  12. 12.
    Buchman, A.S., Wilson, R.S., Bienias, J.L., Bennett, D.A.: Gender differences in upper extremity motor performance of older persons. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 5(1), 59–65 (2005)
  13. 13.
    Maroni, T., Dawson, B., Dennis, M., Naylor, L., Brade, C., Wallman, K.: Effects of half-time cooling using a cooling glove and jacket on manual dexterity and repeated-sprint performance in heat. J. Sports Sci. Med. 17(3), 485–491 (2018)
  14. 14.
    Holzapfel, S.D., et al.: Improvements in manual dexterity relate to improvements in cognitive planning after assisted cycling therapy (ACT) in adolescents with down syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil. 45–46, 261–270 (2015)
  15. 15.
    Nishiyori, R., Bisconti, S., Ulrich, B.: Motor cortex activity during functional motor skills: an fNIRS study. Brain Topogr. 29(1), 42–55 (2016)
  16. 16.
    Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P.A., Bunce, S., Izzetoglu, K., Willems, B., Onaral, B.: Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage 59(1), 36–47 (2012)
  17. 17.
    Lee, G., Jin, S.H., An, J.: Motion artifact correction of multi-measured functional near-infrared spectroscopy signals based on signal reconstruction using an artificial neural network. Sensors (Switzerland) 18(9), 2957 (2018)
  18. 18.
    Milla, K., Bakhshipour, E., Bodt, B., Getchell, N.: Does movement matter? Prefrontal cortex activity during 2D vs. 3D performance of the tower of Hanoi puzzle. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 156 (2019)
  19. 19.
    Liang, L.-Y., Chen, J.-J.J., Shewokis, P.A., Getchell, N.: Developmental and condition-related changes in the prefrontal cortex activity during rest. J. Behav. Brain Sci. 06(12), 485–497 (2016)
  20. 20.
    Peirce, J.W.: PsychoPy-psychophysics software in Python. J. Neurosci. Methods 162(1–2), 8–13 (2007)
  21. 21.
    Dashtestani, H., Cui, J., Harrison, D., Gandjbakhche, A.: Application of machine learning techniques in investigating the relationship between neuroimaging dataset measured by functional near infra-red spectroscopy and behavioral dataset in a moral judgment task. Clin. Transl. Neurophotonics 10864, 32 (2019)
  22. 22.
    Mandrick, K., Derosiere, G., Dray, G., Coulon, D., Micallef, J.P., Perrey, S.: Prefrontal cortex activity during motor tasks with additional mental load requiring attentional demand: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neurosci. Res. 76(3), 156–162 (2013)
  23. 23.
    Buszard, T., et al.: Working memory capacity limits motor learning when implementing multiple instructions. Front. Psychol. 8, 1350 (2017)
  24. 24.
    Maxwell, J.P., Masters, R.S.W., Eves, F.F.: The role of working memory in motor learning and performance. Conscious. Cogn. 12(3), 376–402 (2003)

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elham Bakhshipour
    • 1
    Email author
  • Reza Koiler
    • 1
  • Kimberly Milla
    • 2
  • Nancy Getchell
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomechanics and Movement ScienceUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeuropsychologyKennedy Krieger InstituteBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations